h1

Books on the wiki (how should I presume?)

February 9, 2010

Ok! After a hundred indecisions and visions and revisions, I’ve figured out how I want to books page to work. I’ve added the new section on the wiki and got a list started on all but one of the book sub-topics. If you’re looking for a way to get your wiki hours in that doesn’t involve a ton of actual writing, helping me beef up these lists is a good way to go.

My apologies to whoever was working on the books page at the same time I was. In short, I was afraid that the edit-war we had going was terribly annoying—but I’m pretty sure it was worth it, after all. Dividing the long list into topics feels much better.

Still. Any input on the way the new section is set up would be more than welcome.

h1

[insert creative title here]

February 8, 2010

I know you don’t have CS 404 this week, but you may want to look ahead and start reading The Cuckoo’s Egg while the due date is still a ways out. I can almost guarantee you’ll find it more exciting than Elements of Style. (I thought Elements of Style was riveting, but then, I read usage dictionaries for fun. At least I know I’m a freak.)

Don’t forget to email me about your wiki writing by midnight on Thursday. And, last of all, here’s the Smallish Post 3 extra credit winner. 2TB = Lost of Family History

h1

internet = decapitation? (this is not a threat. keep reading)

February 5, 2010

A couple of you have asked me, among other things, why Internet should be capitalized. That’s a really, really good question. Lots of people leave it in lowercase. Who makes up these stupid rules, anyway? Who cares?

It came to pass, long long ago, that there was a war between Ephraim and Gilead.  A bunch of Ephraimites were trying to get past Gileadite guards, and the Gileadites couldn’t always tell if these guys were enemies or not.  Then, someone had a great idea: every man who tried to cross enemy lines had to say the word SHIBBOLETH. It turns out that the Ephraimites spoke a different language than the Gileadites, and they couldn’t pronounce the SH sound. So, a Gileadite could say shibboleth without blinking an eye, but every time an Ephraimite stuttered, “S-s-s-sibboleth?” a Gileadite would come and lop his head off.  This is the end of the story. (See Judges 12. I didn’t make this stuff up).

Um, ok. What does that have to do with anything, Sarah? As it turns out, the word shibboleth is now used to describe any language choice that marks a person as ignorant, unaware, or uneducated. Whether we mean to or not, we judge people based on the way they write. Read a paper full of speling erors and yull probly think who ever rote it was dum or carless or bothh. Not too long ago, I passed a sign in the RB telling me that an office had been moved to the new EDITION (not addition) of the Tanner Building.  I wasn’t trying to be critical, but an automatic cringe-reflex went off in my brain, and some sort of judgment (ranging from someone didn’t proofread that sign to someone is a MORON!) had been passed.

Sometimes I correct picky things—always capitalize Internet, for example. It’s the rule. But who cares? Who decides what the rule is? The truth is that the rules are often a load of BS some grouchy dead guy  flipped a coin over back in 1732. I’m  serious. Somebody made up a bunch of rules, and that was that. The “rules” don’t always make sense or sound half-decent, yet they are THE RULES. So why follow them?

You can thank this guy for lots of the rules you hate.

You follow these rules because they are the set standards by which you will be judged. What it comes down to is this: Knowledge is power. You need to know what the rules, because otherwise, you can’t make educated choices in language. When you know a rule, you can choose whether to keep it or not. If you don’t know the rules, your ignorance will come back to bite you. In your field, you’ll write the word Internet countless times. People know that, until the powers that be change their minds, capitalizing Internet is the standard rule. If you break it, people will assume you don’t know the rule, and your credibility will be hurt. Leaving it as internet is a shibboleth in your field. Type internet, and people will assume you are dumb, careless, or a dangerous combination of the two.  And in today’s competitive market, you don’t want potential employers or clients to pass that judgment on you.

There are times when it is actually better to break a conventional rule. How do you know? Consider what is most comfortable for you and what your audience will most readily accept. I won a t-shirt last fall that said I CHEER FOR BYU AND WHOEVER IS PLAYING UTAH. That should read whomever—but who would actually wear a shirt with whomever on it to a football game? In this situation, both the speaker and the audience would have felt artificial following the grammar rule, so whoever was the better choice. But the best usage choice, in my opinion, would be to find a “correct” way of saying the same thing that wouldn’t irritate grammarphobes like me: I CHEER FOR BYU AND ANY TEAM THAT BEATS UTAH would have been great on that shirt. Here’s another example: I start sentences with and and but all the time, even though it’s against a rule to do so. It feels natural to me, though, and I don’t think it bothers any of you. In a formal paper for one of my lit classes, however, I’d never dream of doing that. Dr. Ford would lop my head off.

It’s all about being aware of (1) the standards and (2) your audience. This semester, I encourage you to read my corrections and suggestions carefully to learn the rules, then, with that grounding, make smart audience/speaker choices as you write.

Sarah

h1

“So, you think you’re so tough?”

February 2, 2010

Judgment Day today was truly epic. Thanks to everyone involved for prompting a great discussion (and making me laugh so hard my stomach hurt!). I’ve entered grades for the people who participated today, but I don’t know how many points Dr. K wants Judgment Day to be worth or how heavily those points will be weighted. So, for now, it’s a one-point assignment, but know that it’ll count for much more than that in the end.

Don’t forget to report your reading of Elements of Style by midnight.

Sarah

h1

My mistake

January 28, 2010

A lot of people have asked about the roll that went around today. No, there was no reading. I made two kinds of attendance sheets—one with a column for reading and one without—and grabbed the wrong one from my folder this morning. Sorry about all the confusion!

Sarah

h1

Elements of Style & Extra Credit

January 27, 2010

Don’t forget that you need to have completed Elements of Style by midnight on Tuesday, February 2. You need to email me by then telling me that you’ve completed the reading. There’s no blog post associated with this book, but the things you learned from reading it should make all your blog posts better.

Keep Elements of Style handy and refer to it if you have questions. Of course, the book  isn’t complete, and it’s a little conservative as far as usage goes (in the usage world, Strunk = Glenn Beck). If you want any geeky English manual recommendations from me, I’d be happy to direct you to some other fabulous reference guides you can either buy at the Bookstore or find in Humanities Reference on the fifth floor of the library.

As your TA, I reserve the right to dole out as much extra credit as Dr. K will allow. There were several outstanding smallish posts written for Tuesday, and picking one was like picking my favorite child (well, except that I don’t have kids yet, but you get the point). Congrats to our three extra credit winners:

The Social Life of a Computer Scientist

Girls, girls, girls

Equality(=) Does Not Imply Equality

h1

Clarification

January 26, 2010

Smallish Posts are intended to be a response to the assigned reading for the day. If you’ve been directed here, I had trouble seeing a clear connections between women in computing and your post. That could just mean I’m not following your thought process, or it could be that you didn’t follow directions. For this time, it doesn’t matter. But in the future, I may ask you to explain what in the heck you were talking about if your post doesn’t seem even remotely related to the readings. And, if you’re writing about the BCS or your wife’s blueberry waffles recipe when the topic is, say, Internet safety? You, my friends, will lose points. Lo siento.

h1

Current Event 1 Extra Credit

January 25, 2010

Here’s the extra credit-winning post for Current Event 1. This is a great example of a 5/5 current event post: there’s a link to the news article, a concise but well-written paragraph, an opinion offered, and a funny picture to boot.

Gaming rEvolution

h1

Wanted Wiki Pages

January 19, 2010

I’ve posted my wanted pages lists on the wiki main page as well as here on my blog (under Pages on the menu to the right). Look at these rather than the list under Special Pages.

Thanks!

h1

Instructure Spam and Extra Credit

January 16, 2010

I’m so sorry that you’ve all been spammed by Instructure. I’m still figuring things out, so please be patient. I figured out the problem, though, and here’s what you need to do: go to the Profile tab, then hit Communication Preferences. If you don’t want alerts from Instructure, check all the Never boxes.

As you probably already know (again, sorry!), I’ve entered in all the grades I have. You should be able to sign in and look at them.

I’ve also been through all the Smallish Posts. I always post one or two exceptional examples here on my blog. If your post finds its way onto my blog, congrats! You get the distinction of being awesome in addition to receiving an extra point on your post. The ones I choose are examples of what I want to see, so if you want to see your scores go up, you ought to check these out.

Not friends until Facebook friends